Archive for May, 2004

Storytelling and Momentshowing

Wednesday, May 12th, 2004

In May 2004, Peter and I had the marathon conversation through Central Park on videoblogging.
Peter helped me cfeate a blog and post my first video.
Not easy or intuitive but it was possible.

Then, we created the videoblogging group and put out the call.
Very quickly, like-minded people came together.
You can see the new tools being developed.
You can see a small group of people trying to figure out the 3 big problems of putting video on blogs.
Bandwidth, Storage space, and the need for simple editing/posting tools.

The next problem I see is the language of videoblogs.
Do you post short 10 second moments everyday, or post a 5-minute, edited movie every week or two?
I say short, daily moments.
But then the question is: what moments?

I remember when I first had the idea for Momentshowing.
It was 1997 and I had just come back from living in Europe. I was working over there, trying to figure this world out. Young and dumb. I wanted to write and it wasnt working.
So I bought a Hi-8 video camera and started recording.
I didnt know what I was doing, just taping everything.
I’d sit in my basement apartment, making short tapes for my friends.
I wouldn’t build stories. I would edit short Moments together.
Short is between 30-seconds and 2 minutes. In the Moment, you show someone talking or something happening.
I realized that the Moments can be unrelated.
But once editing together, people will make the story up in their own head.
The key is to keep the Moment short, self-contained, and entertaining.
Basically, it’s like looking through a photo book.
Each picture is unrelated to the next, but somehow they give an idea of the world.

So I got a job working in local TV news in Cincinati OH to learn the tools better.
First, I learned that corporate news sucks. the info you get is extremely condescending and lazy.
I thought, wouldn’t it be cool if you just made a 30-minute show with daily Moments from around this small town. You’d get a much better sense of the place than these 2 minute stories on house fires and shootings.
Much better perspective. You’d really get to know people. My news director was unimpressed.
Then, I got a job at CNN in Atlanta.
My ideas of Momentshowing were going crazy.
Imagine a TV show where you showed Moments from all over the world. No stories.
"These are some of the things that happened today. check it."
We’d get to know the world much better. I don’t need someone narrating the world for me.
But CNN of course is about news. Pictures and narration.
They have a definite view of the world that they want you to learn.

In 2000, I quit CNN and tried to be a freelance jouranalist in Kinshasa, which is the captial of the Democratic Republic of Congo.
(This is funny because the country is neither a Democracy or a Republic.)
At CNN, I had worked on a news show about Africa…and never once covered the story of the Congo which was presently at war.
I brought a camcorder and my laptop.
The idea was to post video to my website…showing what life was like in a country at war.
I was interested in people.
But I wasnt ready. Technology wasnt ready.
Upload speeds were too slow; I was too inexperienced with HTML.
So after 4 months, I moved to Manhattan a little wiser.

I got a job at MNN, Manhattan Neighborhood Network.
MNN is the community TV station in Manhattan that airs 1200 original shows per week made by regular people.
No censorship.
After working for corporate news for 4 years, this place was a godsend.
I was teaching people how to make TV, and seeing the fruits of my labor.
Im pretty sure I learn more from my students than I teach them.

Then, I met Peter and we started talking about how to put video on the internet.

Videoblogging.
I get excited because Momentshowing can still happen.
You can record a short Moment and post it with some words.
I could see people all over this planet show us their world.
Iraq, for instance.
What’s it look like? News doesn’t show us.
But forget politics and news right now, think about this.
If you don’t blog in english, only a small community will read your ideas and stories.
But if you videoblog, everyone can understand a video moment.
We can finally start talking to each other directly, instead of learning about each other through the controlled media.

I wonder how long it’ll take for developing countries to get reliable internet and inexpensive cameras?
When will the conversation really start, unmediated?
So i post video as often as I can…playing with the format…watching other people…and waiting for it to grow.

Let’s argue about the philosophy of videoblogging like ancient Kung-fu fighters

Wednesday, May 5th, 2004

Andreas has some real interesting comments about videoblogging.
He’s broken down the statements that Peter and I have made about videoblogging.
Or as I like to call it, Momentshowing, because as I say before this technology only really only allows you to show a Moment.

CODEBASE=”http://www.apple.com/qtactivex/qtplugin.cab”>





First, I work at a community TV station where anyone can come in and make a TV show for free.
We have 1200 original shows per week and most of them are unwatchable.
Most people can make something interesting for no more than 5 minutes.
Why? Because editing takes time and mad skill.
Because shooting video to edit means you must know what you’re doing while you’re doing it.
At this TV station, we are competing with commercial TV for the same audience.
Sometimes we win, but mostly commercial TV just speaks the language better.

What Peter and I are saying is this: anyone can record a Moment from their life. It takes no extra time. You keep it personal. Videoblogging needs to be a new language.
Just like Blogs are not newspaper articles.
You can try to mimic movies and TV in your videoblog, but you will look like a sad imitation.

This is our favourite analogy.
When photography came out, people tried to imitate painting.
The photos were real romantic and blurry looking, like an impressionist painting.
Then someone realized you could take a photo of anything. They began to speak a new language.

When Movies first came out they imitated the theater.
The movie camera was set up and actors moved in front of the camera.
Then, someone realized you could shoot out of sequence, get close ups, panning shots.

When TV first started, they took the radio and vaudeville stars and put them in a studio.
They did their same slapstick acts and corny jokes as that everyone loved.
Then, someone realized you could do something different with TV because it was different.

Videoblogging will go through the same process.
But hopefully it won’t take us 20 years to figure it out.
Peter says that we learn fast these days.
We aren’t going to be successful by creating news stories or movies and posting them online.
Maybe you’re a witness to something and you capture it on video, but again that’s a Moment.
Think about the Rodney King video. More powerful than any Speilberg movie.
If you try to speak the language of existing media, you will usually lose.
They have the money and resources to speak the language better.

Andreas, why don’t you try it?
Who has time to shoot and edit and then post. It’d take at least a week. But we all work and have lives.
Take your digital camera and take some MPEG movies. Optimize them. Upload them. Write something. Post them. 10 minute process.
Show some Moments on your site. Keep them short. Like poetry.
Ive never been to Denmark.
If you posted a 10 second Moment everyday of your world, I’d learn a lot about you or whatever it is you want to show us. Maybe other people.
That’s why Peter says it’s about quantity, not quality(ie. the image doesn’t have to be crystal clear since you got to optimize to keep the file size small).

Peter and I talk about these things.
Video Moments should probably be out into context with text.
You set the Moment up with a written idea or story.
Then you show us a Moment.
Like a blog, we’ll see who shows us what we want to see.
Philosophy is interesting, but we’ll see who actually defines the language by doing it.

Times Square

Tuesday, May 4th, 2004

So I live in NY.
I work at a little TV station near Times Square.
At night I seem to always wander around looking at all the people.
It’s 1am and people are standing around taking pictures of each other.
A bunch of flashing lights and designer names.
I think everyone knows how pointless Times Square is, but no one knows what else to do.

CODEBASE=”http://www.apple.com/qtactivex/qtplugin.cab”>





So Peter it only took me nine minutes to get this Moment up.
The file is still too big, 600k.
I still cant get the –CODEBASE=”http://www.apple.com/qtactivex/qtplugin.cab”>–
out of the published Moment.
Im making myself keep them at 10 seconds.
I think you just got to have fun with it.

Meet Mason

Monday, May 3rd, 2004

So the process of getting a Moment onto the blog is still too long. This one took about 45 minutes from start to finsih. Like Peter says, it should take as long as a regular text blog.
Check out www.me-tv.org.
We are beginning.
Now to the Moment….this is Mason.

CODEBASE=”http://www.apple.com/qtactivex/qtplugin.cab”>





the Fucking process

Saturday, May 1st, 2004

So I’ve been trying to figure out the process for gettign these little Moments up on the blog.
Since I’m using a Mac, I decided to use Cleaner to optimize the files.
I can’t get it down under 500K.
Sorenson seems to be the thing to use, but it cost 250$.

So here’s a little moment, a little piece of poetry. Watch closely with the volume up.

CODEBASE=”http://www.apple.com/qtactivex/qtplugin.cab”>