Ever since we all starting videoblogging as a community in 2004, we have been arguing/discussing/defining the term "videoblog". Richard BF in Australia has continued to maintain a very strong drive of keeping the definition very basic.
Link: The definition of videoblogging as a genre – Richard BF.
His explanation is well thought out. I’m still processing his logic flow.
In his comments, I already see people who are angry because it leaves them out.
Why do we need definitions?
Well, you don’t.
BUT definitions does make it easier to discuss adn evolve an emerging artform, which is what I think videoblogging is.
As always, if you don’t like Richard’s definition, make your own. Blog about it.
The Conversation.
